THE WASHINGTON POST Tuesday, September 9, 1997, Page A19
Barry R. McCaffrey
Medical Marijuana? Don't Do It, D.C.
As the recipient of Harvard University's Zinberg
Award this past spring, I reviewed what the late Dr. Norman Zinberg, a pioneer in
drug-related research, had to say about illegal drugs some three decades ago.
Zinberg argued that "set and setting" -- which is to say "text and
context" -- are pretty much the whole show. To assess the cultural meaning of
alcohol or tobacco, for example, you have to consider how it is used by whom. Wine,
for instance, is different when framed by a religious ritual in church than when drunk in
the street by a "wino" holding a bottle in a bag.
What has changed in drug use over the past 30 years is both set and
setting -- a younger set has adopted the habit, and children are using a wide range of
drugs in settings where they spend most of their time: schools, playgrounds and cars.
The new survey conducted by the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse
(CASA) indicates that a half-million eighth-graders say they began using marijuana in the
sixth and seventh grades. If we picture the 22-year-old co-ed of the 1960s smoking
pot at a rock concert, her counterpart in the '90s is 12 years old and stoned during
third-period English.
The joke has been told: "If you remember the '60s, you probably
weren't there." Today's teens are missing their education or the turn on
Highway 95, not a political rally or jam session. The stakes have changed along with
the drugs. With marijuana being the second leading cause of car crashes among young
people (after alcohol) and with a hundred thousand teenagers moving on to heroin, life
itself is at risk for American kids.
The context for today's drug abuse is homelessness and hopelessness.
With broken families becoming the rule rather than the exception, and with
communities racked by violent crime, too many youngsters no longer have the proverbial
kitchen table where parents can tell them not to use drugs. Teen pregnancy, venereal
disease, delinquency, domestic abuse and rising school dropout rates are other features of
the setting in which illicit drugs are located. Many proponents of legalizing drugs
fail to notice the new terrain where poly-drug use is likely to include crack cocaine,
dangerous hallucinogens, so-called "designer" drugs, and potent chemicals with
purity levels that promote addiction. The short-lived flower children have been
replaced by gangs with guns. What may have begun with pleasure-seeking ends up with
pain-control.
Signatures are now being gathered in the District of Columbia for 1997
Initiative 57, the legalization of "medical marijuana." If approximately
17,000 names can be collected (a figure determined by a percentage of each ward) and
submitted to the D.C. Board of Elections, the petition will be put on the ballot, possibly
this November. Were this measure approved by a majority of voters, Washingtonians
would be able to grow, use, and distribute marijuana with a physician's recommendation.
(No written prescription is required.)
The loosely structured initiative, which allows up to four
"friends" to grow or otherwise provide marijuana for any "patient,"
would permit residents of D.C. to organize and operate marijuana corporations --
ostensibly for the sick. In Arizona, a similar marijuana ballot was passed -- it
also legalized LSD for medical purposes despite the absence of any proven medical benefit
-- only to be repealed by the state legislature after careful consideration.
If pot is such a wonderful medicine, why haven't more doctors
prescribed Marinol, the real "medical marijuana"? The active ingredient in
the cannabis leaf, THC, is synthesized in measured dosages as Marinol, a prescription drug
that has been available for 15 years. The argument that this chemical needs to be
smoked, exposing patients to carcinogenic agents that damage the lungs, doesn't make
sense. No one argues that in place of penicillin capsules, people should revert to
moldy bread.
Crude marijuana, unlike Marinol, would evade the testing process of the
Federal Drug Administration that has made American medicine among the safest in the world.
The current scientific process for approving medications, which entails peer
review by researchers and physicians, should not be supplanted by a nonmedical, political
process. Advocates of drug legalization admit that they have couched the question in
medical terms to camouflage the issue.
The latest research suggests that marijuana relies upon the same
mechanism of chemical reinforcement in the dopamine pathways that is utilized by addictive
drugs such as heroin and cocaine. By hijacking the body's pleasure system, drugs
produce counterfeit highs that substitute for life's genuine rewards.
In the Netherlands, where marijuana technically has been legalized for
personal use, "medical marijuana" was prohibited by the Dutch minister of
health. Holland has no reason to distort the scientific process in order to
represent therapeutic applications for pot. In the United States, a medical blanket
has been thrown over marijuana, obscuring debate. We should not accept a substance
with minimal medical efficacy and maximal psychotropic effects.
The setting for marijuana typically has been in classrooms, where it
interferes with learning; automobiles, where it interferes with driving, and the
workplace, where it interferes with productivity -- not in hospitals contributing to
healing. Our nation's capital has been inundated by waves of drugs, as have other
U.S. cities. D.C. voters should say "yes" to themselves and to our country by
voting "no" on drugs.
The writer is director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy.