A NON PROFIT LEGAL, RESEARCH, AND EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATION |
|
The NORML |
1001 CONNECTICUT AVENUE NW |
T 202-483-8751 F
202-483-0057 E-MAIL NORMLFNDTN@AOL.COM
Internet http://www.norml.org
. . . a weekly service for the media on news items related
to marijuana prohibition.
June 26, 1997
Millions Of Taxpayer Dollars To Be Used
To Fund Local
Anti-Drug Groups
June
26, 1997, Washington, D.C.: Locally based
anti-drug groups such as CADCA (Community Anti-Drug Coalitions of
America) and PRIDE (National Parents' Resource Institute for Drug
Education) can expect a major increase in federal funding thanks
to legislation approved by Congress on June 20.
H.R.
956, the "Drug-Free Communities Act," authorizes the
Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) to appropriate
$143,500,000 over five years to community-based anti-drug groups
that "demonstrate a comprehensive, long term commitment to
reduce substance abuse among youth." Rep. Bob Portman
(R-Ohio), sponsor of the measure and a CADCA board member,
described the bill as "a fundamentally different approach to
addressing the nation's drug crisis." The legislation
now awaits President Bill Clinton's signature.
Ironically,
the measure's supporters cite conflicting findings as
endorsements for the legislation. Section 1021 states that,
"Substance abuse among youth has more than doubled in the
five-year period preceding 1996, with substantial increases in
the use of marijuana, inhalants, cocaine, methamphetamine, LSD,
and heroin." Conversely, the bill later states that,
"Community anti-drug coalitions throughout the United States
are successfully developing and implementing comprehensive,
long-term strategies to reduce substance abuse among youth on a
sustained basis." NORML Executive
Director R. Keith Stroup, Esq. questioned this apparent conflict.
"How
can Congress claim that local anti-drug coalitions are
successfully combating youth drug use while also maintaining that
youth drug use has significantly increased every year since
1991?" Stroup asked. "The age group experiencing
the greatest increase in drug use is the same group that has been
subject to the most comprehensive anti-drug education campaign in
our nation's history. Unfortunately, that campaign -- based
primarily on lies and exaggerations regarding the potential
dangers of marijuana -- is totally ineffective."
Stroup
also reinforced NORML's opposition to adolescent
drug use. "NORML opposes the use of
marijuana, or other drugs including alcohol and tobacco, by
adolescents. NORML remains committed to
the notion that adolescents should grow up drug-free.
However, NORML also opposes legislation that
would designate taxpayers dollars into the hands of propaganda
groups that have failed to demonstrate success at preventing
adolescent drug use."
For
more information, please contact either R. Keith Stroup or Paul
Armentano of NORML @ (202)
483-5500. For more information on community-based anti-drug
coalitions, please contact Allen St. Pierre of The
NORML Foundation @ (202) 483-8751.
(Meanwhile) Drug Czar Announces Youth
Drug Use Still On The Rise,
Advocates More Funding
June
26, 1997, Washington, D.C.: Highlights from a
semi-annual White House report on drug use trends indicate that
adolescent drug use remains on the rise, announced Drug Czar
Barry McCaffrey at a Tuesday press conference. The full
report, Pulse Check: National Trends in Drug Abuse, will
be released this summer.
McCaffrey
used the forum to encourage Congress to approve a proposed $175
million dollar anti-drug media campaign aimed at
adolescents. The money would pay for the purchase of
broadcast, print, billboard, and Internet messages designed to
keep adolescents away from drugs. The Clinton
administration estimates that the campaign will reach 90 percent
of all youths aged 9 to 17 with an anti-drug message at least
four times a week.
McCaffrey
confirmed that the federally supported media campaign will not
target alcohol and tobacco use by young people despite evidence
that adolescents consume both drugs at far higher levels than
they do marijuana, the most commonly used illicit drug by
youngsters.
The
Drug Czar also announced that his office will put out a $400,000
contract to develop a more comprehensive anti-drug campaign on
the Internet. The announcement came just days after The New
York Times featured a front page story entitled: "A Drug
Culture Flourishes on the Internet." The article
alleged that drug-tolerant messages on the Internet are
undercutting the Government's anti-drug policies.
Allen
St. Pierre, Executive Director of The NORML Foundation,
responded that almost every federal health agency and anti-drug
organization such as The Office of National Drug Control Policy
(ONDCP), the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Partnership
for a Drug-Free America (PDFA), Center on Addiction and Substance
Abuse (CASA), and others already have Internet capability and
active websites. "This appropriation is yet another
example of gross government excess in the War on Drugs," he
said.
For
more information, please contact Allen St. Pierre of The
NORML Foundation @ (202) 483-8751.
Sweeping Drug Testing Bill Passed By The Louisiana Legislature
June
26, 1997, Baton Rouge, LA: The state Legislature
approved sweeping legislation on June 21 that would mandate
welfare recipients and others to submit to drug tests. The
measure now awaits the signature of Gov. Mike Foster who is a
proponent of wide-scale drug testing.
House
Bill 2435, introduced by Rep. Heulette "Clo" Fontenot
(R-Livingston), requires drug testing for virtually all residents
receiving moneys from the state, including welfare recipients and
individuals who enter into contracts with the state to provide
goods and services. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
spokeswoman Martha Kegel, who argued against the bill, said that
no other state in the nation has implemented such a program and
estimated that the policy could cost Louisiana taxpayers millions
of dollars.
The
legislation requires individuals in the Temporary Assistance for
Needy Families Block Grant Program to undergo mandatory drug
testing. Participants who test positive for illicit drugs
on one occasion must complete a drug rehabilitation
program. Individuals who test positive a second time will
no longer be eligible to receive state entitlements.
"This
bill ... subject[s] ... impoverished people to the indignity and
gross invasion of privacy of having to urinate in a jar as a
condition of getting the assistance that they need," Kegel
said.
The
bill also requires random drug testing for "all persons who
receive anything of economic value or receive funding from the
state." Individuals who refuse to comply with the
policy or who test positive for an illegal drug on more than one
occasion shall be subject to "termination, removal, or loss
of the contract or loan."
"There
is little evidence indicating that this policy is either
necessary or legal," said NORML Executive
Director R. Keith Stroup, Esq. Stroup noted that the
Supreme Court recently struck down a Georgia drug testing statute
because the state failed to demonstrate a "special
need" substantial enough to override Constitutional
protections granted by the Fourth Amendment. Stroup
speculated that a similar court challenge could strike down
Louisiana's measure.
Backers
of the measure alleged that a "state of emergency"
exists in Louisiana because of illicit drug use.
For
more information, please contact either attorney William
Rittenberg of the NORML Legal Committee @ (504)
524-5555 or R. Keith Stroup of NORML @ (202)
483-5500.
-END-
MORE THAN 10 MILLION MARIJUANA ARRESTS SINCE 1965 . . . ANOTHER EVERY 54 SECONDS! |